The Physically Challenged II

เขียนโดย Eva | 10:13

I and my husband once worked as nurse aides at the first apartment building in the nation built specifically for people in wheelchairs, namely Center Park, which shares the same initials as cerebral palsy, one of the world's most common severe physical disabilities. There is a huge United Cerebral Palsy Residential Center in Seattle, Washington, USA, and many people with cerebral palsy live at Center Park as well. It's right next door to the Lighthouse for the Blind, and some blind people live in Center Park as well.

The legend of Center Park was the guy who made it up the stairwell in his manual wheelchair, got onto the roof, and jumped off and successfully died. Really, there was nothing to do at Center Park, except for gossip mongering and television. The most exciting weekly event was when the old ladies left on the communal charter bus to go get their ancient hair done at the beauty parlor, or once a week working in the arts and crafts room, needing to allow several days for your project to harden and dry.

Nowadays, thank God, disabled people have the Internet within easy reach. A life of contemplating suicide is no real life, don't you think? That major problem with spending one's time is now relatively resolved. But there are surely other such Civil Rights Movement problems to conquer, including renaming the entire thing something weird, like the Independent Living Movement. Actually, I'm just kidding; those are two separate movements. Black People don't think in terms of their being disabled like "we" are, they consider themselves able and challenged only by social rituals such as being or not being hired and other such sociological problems. It is an entirely different thing, but there are certainly disabled African-Americans who need access to both of those movements. Learning disabilities - for one - are prevalent in every community in the United States. At Center Park, there was some discussion that I recall about this. Learning disabilities can preclude your being able to compete on the same level for a job, whether you live at Center Park or anywhere else. Life in there included many such learning challenges.

There's still the most beautiful Adam and Eve garden you ever saw, which was focused on your being able to circumnavigate it in a wheelchair with ease. But they probably won't let you smoke at Center Park nowadays, except for right outside the building's perimeter. Smoking was "not allowed" - back in the 1980s. I'm sure they still let them smoke outside. The wondrous garden, a fairytale paradise of sorts, was looped around the building, and it but now lurks in my mind's eye - it's where two almost ex-heroes met, namely, my husband and me. I had saved a Black family once, and he had rescued thousands of people during his stint as a medic in the Viet Nam War.

We had both several times tossed our lives away to serve other people - and we both had completely forgotten that. He and I were personal care attendants, me in the home, and he in the hospital system. We were finally villains for a change with each other, and we "dumped" Center Park to get married and have an able bodied child. I went quite overboard to make sure she would be safe. So I am one of the "escapees" of Center Park, although I was never one of the residents. At the time I lived there, I wasn't yet physically or mentally challenged. That would come later, when I was put on medication for depression, which did some bad things to my physical system and caused severe spasming and disability, most of which has now abated with me. Reggie has a bad back and some other minor physical problems, but he's now semi-retired, and he can still perform his beloved landscaping and gardening without any real problems.

What you need to learn from this article is that even autobiographical stuff can make one very happy and content person happen. Anyway, this is really about Social Politics, and the way of the world is that even disabled people must suffer from losing one or more attendants at a time. Then, they get replaced by other ones. What truth this becomes is there is a job in politics awaiting you if you care for caring for other people. In short, disabled people need attendants, and this article advertises for the job. You can find it in the newspapers and on the Internet under "home health care aides" - and other such titles.

You don't have to think of it as politics so much anymore because of the Internet. Also, it's a nursing oriented job that can lead to wonderful factionalism among the compadres who gather and create new things that make absolutely this entire world into a wonderful place. Meanwhile, I know this is true, because I am now disabled physically - where I wasn't before; it was going to happen anyway, and yes, I am now a professional writer. You too can do such terrific things with your life, such as writing for pay, and now all of we who are physically challenged have the WWW Internet at our polite disposal.

Isn't life great, whether you're disabled, handicapped, physically or mentally challenged, or not, when you have something to do? For example, although I have a minor physical disability and some minor mental difficulties, I am quite capable of being a freelance writer, copy editor, rewriter, ghost writer, author and illustrator on an ongoing professional basis. Therefore, you should consider my services, if you have a book manuscript or are preparing one for publication.

Thus ends my series of articles about our local Independent Living Movement and the Physically and Mentally Challenged people of Center Park, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Avoiding Business Politics Can Derail Career Success

เขียนโดย Eva | 09:53

Survival of the Savvy: High-Integrity Political Tactics for Career and Company Success

Authors: Rick Brandon Ph.D. and Marty Seldman Ph.D.

Survival of the Savvy was on my bookshelf about a month before I had the privilege of meeting the author, Rick Brandon, at a leadership conference in San Francisco where we both were speaking. Our talks were at different times so I was able to attend Rick's presentation.

That was when I realized how important this book could be to all the women I work with who are sometimes underestimated, overlooked, and denied proper recognition for their accomplishments because they abhor and avoid anything associated with the word politics. If this sounds like you, you are not alone.

Survival of the fittest! That is what it feels like in the work world sometimes. I know how tough it can be. I have worked in business since the mid 1980's where I have witnessed political games of all sorts - power struggles, back biting, turf wars, and blind ambition.

Reading the book you will learn that the stereotypical image of the term 'political', that usually is thought of as overly political and at time unethical behaviors are definitely not what the authors are recommending.

Survival of the Savvy describes the political style continuum that ranges from the less political type who believe hard work, facts, and good ideas are enough to the overly political individuals driven by self-interest.

Brandon and Seldman suggest a high integrity middle ground (aka ethical and more palatable,) approach to politics that even the most politically averse can employ. They call it the green light/safe travel zone. This vital balance is neither too political nor politically naive.

Power and politics are not dirty words. You can promote yourself with integrity. These are important messages in the book for all women in business and especially for those in the traditionally less political career tracks who want to advance to leadership positions - women in science, R&D, Information Technology, engineering, and other technical fields.

The authors successfully help readers, who hate the thought of workplace politics, reframe how they think about power and politics. They offer useful and practical advice even for the political novice.

The further you advance, the more vulnerable you are if you remain politically naive. The authors claim in their experience ethical political skills are a leadership competency.

If you want to get ahead, but are so opposed to the concept of politics and to any of the ideas in the book the day will come when your subject matter and expert technical status are no longer good enough for you to advance. Your career will plateau. Shunning even high integrity, ethical politics can mean you are destined to succeed only in a job in the ranks below management and leadership. If you do progress into management you are at risk to derail in all but the most non-political cultures.

Reading and applying the information in the book is not easy but worthwhile for all who want to land the top jobs and earn the income they deserve. If you feel frustrated or have plateaued in your career advancement, it may be a political blind spot and reading this book can help.

Although not a book written specifically for women, the authors offer 'political' success strategies especially relevant for women.

Does A Holy Book Tell Us To Fight A War?

เขียนโดย Eva | 05:24

During history, the number of wars which have been fought with the bible or other book in the hand, are almost too numerous to count. The question is whether the religious teachings in these holy books, of whatever persuasion, cause these wars. Are religious wars based on the teachings in holy books, I wonder. As an example, were the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington incited by the Holy Koran? And on the other side of the coin, where in the Christian Bible did George W Bush find the approval to invade Iraq? Probably people would have a hard time finding the terrorist attack instructions in the Koran, or an attack on Iraq in the Christian Bible, after all their teachings are based on historical facts rather than futuristic predictions.

It seems straightforward. It's people's interpretations of their specific holy books that start wars and terrorist attacks. It is not what is written in these books that does it. It is what people read into them. Maybe that is even incorrect. It is people's megalomaniacal thinking that starts wars. And in order to justify those actions, the holy books are brought into it. Bush wanted to feel secure in his own country. That's what he says was his reason to go to war. But maybe it was more like, I'm an American don't you dare mess with me, attitude that got Bush into the war in the first instance.

So what would have gotten a whole bunch of men decide that they wanted to give up their lives for some cause. So they quoted the Koran in order to justify their actions. But that's not why they did it surely? Whereas we can understand where Bush and his little intellect came from, us Westerners have a problem understanding the thinking behind the suicide pilots. We could understand the Japanese Kamikaze fighter pilots who were prepared to give their lives for their country. But Saudi Arabians weren't giving their lives for their country. Were they giving their lives for a religion? What for. Who cares why they did it? We would only want to know how to stop them. We only care about the innocent people who died. We don't really care whether a couple of terrorist died as well. Most of us Westerners are not about to give them hero status. Is anybody else?

What has made me think of all of this, is a blog I read. And one of the elements in the blog were quotes out of the various holy Books which explained what that particular religion preached about how to handle your 'neighbour'. And in none of these quotes does it say anything except that you should appreciate and honour your neighbour, or read person you come across.

So here are the quotes for you to be amazed over. I was:

The Golden Rule

Christianity: "In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets." Jesus--Matthew 7:12

Hinduism: "This is the sum of duty: do not to others what would cause pain if done to you." Mahabaratha 5:1517

Taoism: "Regard your neighbor's gain as you own gain, and your neighbor's loss as your own loss." T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien, 213-18

Native Spirituality-"We are as much alive as we keep the earth alive" Chief Dan George

Buddhism: "Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." Udana-Varga 5.18

Judaism: "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary." Hillel, Talmud, Shabbat 31a

Islam: "Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself." The Prophet Muhammad, Hadith

Sikhism: "I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all." Guru Granth Sahib

Baha'i Faith: "Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself." Baha'u'liah, Gleanings

Jainism: "One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated." Mahavira, Sutravitanga

Unitarianism: " We affirm and promote respect for the interdependence of all existence of which we are a part."

Zoroastrianism: "Do not unto others what is injurious to yourself." Shayast-na-Shayast 13.29

I got these from Karen who writes her blog on http://www.livethepower.com/blog - view full post there - and she gave me permission to use some of her content, which is as the quoted extracts from various bibles/holy books or verbal traditional legend. When one reads these, one actually wonders where all those wars come from. It's certainly not something as written in the scriptures. That's for sure.

It is Politics As Usual - A Book Review on Taking Sides

เขียนโดย Eva | 19:23

How much do you know about world politics? Geopolitics can be one of the most interesting subjects, and if you'd like to learn more, perhaps you need to dive into the challenges of our time, and understand all sides of the debate. I believe that's the best way to approach it, and if you agree, there's a very good book I'd like to recommend to you, the name of the book is;

"Taking Sides - Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in World Politics" by John T. Rourke.

In this book the author asks some pretty tough questions, about some of the most challenging and problematic issues of our time. Each chapter adds to the chaos and controversy of world events in our present period. And there are many questions, which perhaps have no answer, however are debated by scholars and academics alike. In fact, one of the tough questions is frequented by those that write articles in foreign affairs, the economist, and in letters to the Washington Post and New York Times.

"Is the Capitalist model for Third World development destructive?"

This is a very tough question, and one that is always discussed at the Davos World Economic Conference. But there are more comments, questions, and concerns in this book for instance;

"Is economic globalism a positive trend?"

The international monetary fund or IMF suggests that globalism should serve all, but countries and corporations often exploit the labor. Everyone benefits if we are all on the same page, even if it undermines their national sovereignty temporarily. The debaters also discuss international cooperation and choice in trade. And they discuss issues of global governance, and if it is right if it is forced? One debater suggests that the European Union is in danger of a revolution of culture and economics, however the academics of Europe have an answer for that as well.

If you want to get at the heart of the debate of the new world order, how to run the United Nations, a global currency, or a global trade free market place, there is probably no better book to start out with to hear all the different sides of the chaos and controversy surrounding these topics. Indeed, I hope you will please consider all this.

50000 Books

เขียนโดย Eva | 16:39

A landmark shoppe in San Diego deals with staying afloat while drowning in books.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6sUDrW6iJ4&hl=en

the eye in the vortex, the accountable of me, and the third sex

เขียนโดย Eva | 11:52

here i discuss the eye in the vortex, myself and the third sex in ancient religion. mysticism, occult, metaphysics, eye, vortex, rome, christianity, third sex, hijra, inanna, ishtar, history, politics, transgender, transvestite, transexual, taoism, buddhism, daoism, gnosticism, jesus, christ, osiris, typhon, lucifer, ninurta, megaman, super mario bros., jim morrison



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbRiXk8Mlv4&hl=en

President Barack Obama's Official Portrait Makes History

เขียนโดย Eva | 06:48

President Barack Obama is making history in many ways, and his official presidential portrait is no exception. President Obama made history when his official portrait was taken with a digital camera. His official portrait will now be hung in federal buildings, military bases, schools, offices, and embassies across the world.

The photo was taken with an American flag in the background and flag pin on Obama's lapel.

Thanks to digital camera technology, we can look at the EXIF data and see details of the photograph.

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Date: January 13, 2009 - 5:38 PM
Lens: 105mm - f/10
Exposure: 1/125
ISO: 100

The photograph was taken by Pete Souza, the new official White House photographer. Prior to being announced as the White House photographer, Souza was a freelance photographer and assistant professor of photojournalism at Ohio University's School of Visual Communication. Souza is familiar with the White House. During President Ronald Reagan's second term, Souza was named official White House photographer for the first time.

He met Barack Obama during Obama's first day in the United States Senate. His photography of then Senator Obama was turned into a book called "The Rise of Barack Obama". The book includes exclusive photographs of Obama's rise to power. Souza traveled extensively with Obama during his first year in the Senate including trips to Kenya, South Africa and Russia.

The portrait can be downloaded at www.change.gov/ The photo is in the public domain meaning there is no legal restriction on how it can be used.